Accessibility Links

Select a Language:

  1. English Language
  2. German Language
  3. Dutch Language
  4. French Language
  5. Italian Language
  6. Czech Language
  7. Danish Language
  8. Swedish Language
  9. Croatian Language
  10. Finish Language
  11. Portugal Language
  12. Spanish Language
  13. Norwegian Language
  14. Macedonian Language
  15. Serbian Language
  16. Polish Language
  17. Hungarian Language
Banner

Main Content:

Latest News

Back

ECEAE expresses concern over failure to reject proposals to test on animals

 

The ECEAE has today expressed concern that results published this week by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in its Evaluation report fail to report that in 2011 the agency rejected any proposal to test on animals.

Under REACH legislation (in order to reduce animal testing), companies must submit their animal testing proposals which are then made available for public comments, evaluated by the Agency and finally agreed by its Member State Committee.

Out of 22 final decisions made in 2011, 18 were agreed without modification, 4 were accepted with modifications. None were rejected.

A total of 80 proposals were processed last year, out of which a large proportion (58) were withdrawn by the company before a final decision was made. Although some of these were because the company realised they did not need to do the test, others were because they had already started the animal test – contrary to REACH rules. Although the ECEAE welcomes a move by ECHA to ask companies in this situation to justify their actions, we believe that further action is needed. According to last year’s report some 107 animal tests each involving hundreds of animals were done without a testing proposal. 

A total of 715 testing proposals are to be processed following the first registration deadline of December  2010. The ECEAE estimated last year that if all were agreed this would result in over 1 million animals being used in reproductive , developmental and repeated dose toxicity tests.

These latest figures, the first of any significance published by the ECHA, point to a worrying trend to simply rubber stamp animal testing proposals.  The ECEAE is heavily involved in commenting on testing proposals and will be following up its concerns with the Agency.

“I ABHOR VIVISECTION WITH MY WHOLE SOUL. ALL THE SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES STAINED WITH INNOCENT BLOOD I COUNT AS OF NO CONSEQUENCE.”  MOHANDAS (MAHATMA) GANDHI

Top of the page